Comments on: Yashica ML 50/1.9 http://www.prime35.com/yashica-ml-50mm-f-1-9/ Lenses for 35mm Cameras Tested and Reviewed Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:09:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: admin http://www.prime35.com/yashica-ml-50mm-f-1-9/comment-page-1/#comment-16 admin Wed, 02 Mar 2011 03:46:49 +0000 http://www.prime35.com/?p=37#comment-16 Don't have one (too expensive). Supposed to be a really nice one. http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=25793&view=next Don’t have one (too expensive). Supposed to be a really nice one. http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=25793&view=next

]]> By: pierrerios http://www.prime35.com/yashica-ml-50mm-f-1-9/comment-page-1/#comment-15 pierrerios Wed, 02 Mar 2011 03:20:07 +0000 http://www.prime35.com/?p=37#comment-15 What do you think about yashica 55mm 1.2? What do you think about yashica 55mm 1.2?

]]> By: admin http://www.prime35.com/yashica-ml-50mm-f-1-9/comment-page-1/#comment-14 admin Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:12:48 +0000 http://www.prime35.com/?p=37#comment-14 I have most ML fifties including 2.0, 1.9, 1.7 and 1.4. Of those, I like the 1.4 version the most, followed by the slower 2.0 and 1.9 counterparts (because of their character and drawing). The 1.7 version might be sharper, but it does not have the bokeh "swirls", and that was what I was after. I have most ML fifties including 2.0, 1.9, 1.7 and 1.4. Of those, I like the 1.4 version the most, followed by the slower 2.0 and 1.9 counterparts (because of their character and drawing). The 1.7 version might be sharper, but it does not have the bokeh “swirls”, and that was what I was after.

]]> By: natums http://www.prime35.com/yashica-ml-50mm-f-1-9/comment-page-1/#comment-13 natums Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:02:20 +0000 http://www.prime35.com/?p=37#comment-13 I love my ML f/1.9 also. Have you compared it to the ML 50mm f/1.7? It is supposed to be measurably sharper on the wider aperture and can be had pretty cheap. I got one coming my way any day now and I'm excited to compare it. I love my ML f/1.9 also. Have you compared it to the ML 50mm f/1.7?

It is supposed to be measurably sharper on the wider aperture and can be had pretty cheap. I got one coming my way any day now and I’m excited to compare it.

]]>